Call for Papers
Cultural-Historical Activity Theory (CHAT), rooted in the legacy of Vygotsky, Leont’ev and Luria, is a multidisciplinary
theory, which has gained increasing popularity and relevance among researchers in the field of organization studies (Adler,
2005; Blackler, 2009). CHAT is a theory oriented towards analyzing hidden and overt power structures in organizations (Blackler
& MacDonald, 2000). It offers a framework for researchers and practitioners to become involved in collective learning
and change processes during which dysfunctional power structures are challenged (Blackler, 2009; Engeström, 2009). CHAT provides
analytical, conceptual tools, such as models of activity systems, concepts of contradiction and zones of proximal development
to examine organizations as designed by human beings (Engeström, 2006; Engeström & Sannino, 2011).
CHAT has proven to be a useful theory, for example in the following areas of organization studies:
- Strategic management, practices of strategy making
- Organizational learning and competencies
- Organizational change management and knowledge management
CHAT includes an interventionist methodology for enhancing reflection of hidden and overt power structures in collective activities and supporting developments to overcome dysfunctional power structures in organizations. The methodology has various applications in which theory and practice intertwine, such as the Change Laboratory method and the Clinic of Activity. The use of CHAT in the study of organizations has, however, not yet deeply anchored in discussions within organization studies. The aim of this sub-theme is to bring together scholars using activity-theoretical frameworks and to develop and cultivate the use of CHAT in organization studies further.
In this sub-theme, we identify a range of themes concerning activity theory and organizations. We welcome papers examining themes such as:
- Manifestations of power in organizational interventions
- Expansive learning and concept formation in and between organizations
- Dialectical contradictions and their resolutions in organizations
- Multivoicedness and agency in organizations
- Organizational boundary crossing and knotworking
- Multiple tool constellations and their roles in reflection and innovation processes in organizations
We also invite contributions that deal with other, related themes and appreciate papers establishing a dialogue between CHAT and other practice-based theories (Miettinen, Samra-Fredericks & Yanow, 2009). We are also interested in theoretical papers taking a critical stance towards CHAT as a theory. We welcome innovative, theoretical and empirical work as well as both micro- and macro-level analysis. We especially appreciate empirical papers using CHAT as a methodological tool in the study of organizations.
- Adler, P.S. (2005): "The Evolving Object of Software Development." Organization, 12 (3), 401–436.
- Blackler, F. (2009): "Cultural-Historical Activity Theory and Organization Studies." In: A. Sannino, H. Daniels & K.D. Gutiérrez (eds.): Learning and Expanding with Activity Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 19–39.
- Blackler, F., & MacDonald, S. (2000): "Power, Mastery and Organizational learning." Journal of Management Studies, 37 (6), 833–851.
- Engeström, Y. (2006): "Activity Theory and Expansive Design." In: S. Bagnara & G. Crampton-Smith (eds.): Theories and Practice of Interaction Design. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 3–23.
- Engeström, Y. (2009): "The Future of Activity Theory: A Rough Draft." In: A. Sannino, H. Daniels & K.D. Gutiérrez (eds.): Learning and Expanding with Activity Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 303–328.
- Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2011): "Discursive Manifestations of Contradictions in Organizational Change Efforts: A Methodological Framework." Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24 (3), 368–387.
- Miettinen, R., Samra-Fredericks, D., & Yanow, D. (2009): "Re-Turn to Practice: An Introductory Essay." Organization Studies, 30 (12), 1309–1327.